Important Girls’s Well being Sources: The place to Discover Proof-Primarily based Data
![]()

Please be aware: On this article, the time period ‘ladies’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender id.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place ladies’s our bodies are consistently underneath fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re very important sources on all the pieces from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial range. The form of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers individuals to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little rationalization and 0 accountability. If that feels like a conflict on ladies, effectively… you’re not mistaken.
When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to struggle again. Meaning getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed ladies’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to resolve what we do or don’t should find out about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Equipped Well being Information is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being businesses just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA had been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in current months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: hundreds of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed essentially the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is crucial to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has lately modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steerage.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This consists of very important public well being data on matters corresponding to HIV and sexually transmitted illnesses, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial range, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts ladies, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face vital challenges in making knowledgeable choices about remedy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply limit entry to data—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Luckily, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it obtainable to the general public5. This text incorporates an inventory of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one social gathering to a different mustn’t have an effect on the provision of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming pattern highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Position of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Girls’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance ladies’s well being by means of coverage, training, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a essential step in guaranteeing that illnesses, therapies, and medical interventions are researched with ladies’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by means of menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more essential.
Trusted, Proof-Primarily based Girls’s Well being Sources
Under is a curated checklist of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steerage tailor-made to the distinctive well being issues of ladies of their reproductive years, throughout the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By in search of out and sharing these sources, we will collectively safeguard entry to very important well being data and be sure that all ladies have the knowledge they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:
Reproductive Well being Entry Venture
Trains and helps major care clinicians to broaden entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Provides free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person training supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife ladies’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Levels:
The American School of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed ladies’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an energetic position of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and training. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality companies and is the most important supplier of intercourse training within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Provides rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Girls
Targeted on ladies aged 35 to 64, this group offers medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome growing old and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Common Hospital Middle for Girls’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Data Middle
Provides reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life levels, with specialised assist for BIPOC people in search of culturally aligned care.
Middle for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by means of diet, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply essential—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that assist knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your mates, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Assist the organizations doing the exhausting work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody inform you that your well being isn’t value preventing for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says